EFL Learners' Pragmatic Tolerance of Quantity Maxim Violation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69513/jnfh.v2n3.en5Keywords:
Tolerance, Informativeness, Scalar Implicature, Quantity Maxim.Abstract
The current study embarks on investigating Iraqi EFL learners' pragmatic tolerance of quantity maxim violations. Additionally, it seeks to shed light on Iraqi EFL learners' pragmatic abilities in deriving pragmatic inferences from utterances that contain violations of quantity maxim. The experimental work in the current study utilized two types of sentence judgment tasks. Binary sentence judgment task for investigating learners' pragmatic tolerance, and ternary judgment task for investigating learners' pragmatic competence. The study included two groups of participants. The first group included 50 participants from 2nd-year students, and the second included 50 from 4th-year students at the Department of English for the academic year 2023-2024; both groups judged underinformative scalar implicature utterances. The results with binary task data indicate that Iraqi EFL learners exhibit tolerance toward quantity maxim violations. However, the ternary judgment task results indicate that Iraqi learners are not competent enough to derive a pragmatic inference. Hence, the current study attempts to provide a comprehensive understanding of EFL learners' pragmatic abilities to derive implied meanings.
Downloads
References
Cruse, D. A. (2015). Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Davies, C., & Katsos, N. (2010). Over-informative children: Production/comprehension asymmetry or tolerance to pragmatic violations? Lingua, 120, 1956–1972
Feng, S. (2022). L2 tolerance of pragmatic violations of informativeness. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.
Garcia, P. (2004). Pragmatic Comprehension of High- and Low-Level Language Learners.
Grice, H. P. (1975) Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & H. Morgan (Eds.). Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hamidi, B., & Khodareza, M. (2014). The Relationship between Iranian EFL Learners’ Language Proficiency and Pragmatic Competence. ELT Voices.
Hoffman-Hicks, S. (1999). The longitudinal development of French foreign language pragmatic competence and evidence from study abroad participants. Indiana University, Bloomington.
Horn, L. R. (1972). On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. Doctoral dissertation. Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Katsos, N., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2011). Pragmatic tolerance: Implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature. Cognition, 120(1), 67–81
Kearns, K. (2000). Semantics. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Larson-Hall, J. (2015). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS and R. Routledge.
Pipijn, K. & Schaeken, W. (2012). Children and Pragmatic Implicatures: A Test of the Pragmatic Tolerance Hypothesis with Different Tasks. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 34, 2186-2191.
Schulz, J. M. (2021). Pragmatic competence and pragmatic tolerance in foreign language acquisition – revisiting the case of scalar implicatures [Master's thesis]. University of Oxford.
Slabakova, R. (2010). Scalar implicatures in second language acquisition. Lingua, 120, 2444–2462.
Snape, N., & Hosoi, H. (2018). Acquisition of scalar implicatures: Evidence from adult Japanese L2 learners of English. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8, 163–92.
Taguchi, N. (2006). Analysis of appropriateness in a speech act of request in L2 English. Pragmatics, 16(4) 513–533.
Taguchi, N. (2013). Implicature. In Robinson, P. (Ed.). (2013). The Routledge Encyclopaedia of Second Language Acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Routledge.
Veenstra, A., & Katsos, N. (2018). Assessing the comprehension of pragmatic language: Sentence judgment tasks. In K. P. S. Andreas H. Jucker & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in pragmatics (pp. 257–279). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110424928-010.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Al-Noor Journal for Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
