Addressing Strangers in Mosuli Arabic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69513/jnfh.v1.i1.a1Abstract
Abstract
The study aims to investigate the socio-cultural rules that govern address usage in daily conversation in Mosuli Arabic within non-familiar context. A socio-pragmatic approach is adopted in this study and by using semi-structured interviews to collect data from 80 participants in English Department, College of Education for Humanities, University of Mosul. The selection of the participants is based on four variables namely: age, gender, educational status and marital status. In this study, two theoretical framework are selected as a model of analysis namely the communication accommodation theory (1987) and the power and solidarity theory of Brown and Gilman (1968). The study finds that the age and appearance are the most effective determiners of address choice in Mosul society. kinship terms are extended to address strangers and they are the best mean in achieving accommodation.
Downloads
References
References
Al –Qudah, M. (2017). "The Jordanian terms of address: A Socio-pragmatic Study". Princess Sumaya University for Technology. Jordan
Alharbi, T. (2015)." A Socio-pragmatic Study of Forms of Address and Terms of Reference in Classical Arabic as Represented in the Chapter of Joseph in the Holy Quran". The University of Leeds. School of Languages, Cultures and Societies (LCS)
Brown, R. and Gilman, A. (1960). "The Pronoun of Power and Solidarity". In T. A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language, MIT Press, pp 253-76.
Chika E. (1982). Language: The Social Mirror. Rowley. Newbury House Publishers Inc.
De Klerk, V. and Bosch, B.(2014). "Nicknames as sex-role stereotypes". Rhodes University.
Dickey, E. (1997). "Forms of Address and Terms of Reference". In: Linguistics: 255-274
Giles, H. (2016). Communication Accommodation Theory. Negotiating Personal Relationships and Social Identities across Contexts. Cambridge university press. United Kingdom.
Hwang, S.J.J. (1991). "Terms of Address in Korean and American Cultures". Intercultural Communication Studies I(2), pp117-134 The University of Texas at Arlington Summer Institute of Linguistics
Hymes D. (1974). Foundation in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. University of Pennsylvania Press. Pennsylvania
Keshavarz, M.H. (2001). "The Role of Social Context, Intimacy, and Distance in the Choice of Forms of Address". International Journal of the Sociology of Language. 148 (2001), 5-18.
Kubayi, S. (2013). "Address Forms in Xitsonga: A Socio-pragmatic Perspective". University of South Africa.
Lambert WE, Tucker GR. (1976). Tu, vous, usted: A Social-psychological Study of Address Patterns. Rowley. Mass. Newbury House.
Parkinson, D.B. 1985. Constructing The Social Context of Communication: Terms of Address in Egyptian Arabic. Berlin, New York and Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.
Qin, X. (2008). "Choices in Terms of Address: A Sociolinguistic Study of Chinese and American English Practices". Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL20).Vol. 1: 409-421.
Appendix
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Al-Noor Journal for Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
